top of page
Search

The Most Overlooked Step in a Strong O-1 Visa Petition: Contextualizing Your Evidence

Updated: Nov 19

ree

When looking at the long list of O-1 criteria, most people assume it all comes down to one thing: the number of your achievements.


But in reality, USCIS regularly sends RFEs or even denies petitions not because the applicant isn’t accomplished enough - but because the evidence wasn’t presented with enough context.


Context is one of the most overlooked - yet most impactful - parts of a successful O-1 petition. It’s the difference between an adjudicator immediately understanding why something matters, or overlooking it entirely.


Let me break down why context matters, what USCIS actually looks for, and how to transform confusing exhibits into clear, compelling evidence:


Why context matters more than you think

USCIS adjudicators are experts in U.S. immigration policy, not experts in your field.


They review petitions from every discipline on earth: scientists, musicians, designers, technologists, founders, athletes, architects, performers, marketers, and much more.


This means:

  • They don’t know the prestige of your award.

  • They don’t know the impact of your project.

  • They don’t know the reach of the publication covering you.

  • They don’t know how competitive your selection was.

  • They don't know the top players in your field.

  • They don't know the specific idiosyncrasies of your industry.


If you don’t explain it, they don’t know it. And if they don’t know it, they can’t approve it.


What USCIS actually needs from you to understand your case

For every piece of evidence, an adjudicator needs to quickly grasp:


1. What is this?

A grant? A feature? An exhibition? A press article? A testimonial?


2. Why does it matter?

Prestige, selectivity, difficulty, influence, impact, innovation,...?


3. What was your specific role?

Be explicit, even if it seems obvious.


4. How does it tie to the O-1 criteria?

Each item must support a specific regulatory category.

If any one of these is unclear, the strength of the evidence collapses.


How to add context the right way

1. Use short, sharp exhibit descriptions

Every exhibit should include a paragraph that explains:

  • What the item is

  • Why it’s significant

  • Relevant metrics or prestige indicators

  • How it demonstrates extraordinary ability


2. Include third-party credibility markers

For example

  • “Featured in a publication with 2M monthly visitors.”

  • “Selected from over 500 applicants.”

  • “Awarded by a nationally recognized organization.”

  • “Used by institutions in X countries.”


3. Avoid industry jargon

Write for someone with zero technical background.

Instead of:“Published in a Q1 HCI venue,” say: “Published in one of the top peer-reviewed conferences in human-computer interaction, with an acceptance rate of 18%.”


4. Connect each exhibit directly to a criterion

Clearly state which criterion you're seeking to satisfy with the specific evidence and outline how you are accomplishing this.


Examples of strong vs. weak context

Weak

“This project was successful and widely used.”


Strong

“This project was adopted by three major organizations (x, y, and z), reaching over 1.2M users in its first year. It demonstrates the impact of the applicant’s work in their field and satisfies the criterion for original contributions of major significance.”


Why context is your secret advantage

Most O-1 petitions fail not because the applicant lacks achievements, but because the achievements weren’t presented in a way that meets the legal standard.


Context is your way of translating your career into language USCIS can evaluate.

It turns confusion into clarity, and clarity helps officers issue an approval.


Final thoughts

If you take one step to strengthen your O-1 petition this week, make it this:

Review your exhibits and ask whether each one would be meaningful to someone outside your field.


If the answer is no, add context - even a couple sentences can transform the strength of your evidence.


Need help making your evidence clear?

This is exactly what I do at Portico - translate your work into a compelling, legally framed narrative that USCIS can clearly understand and approve.



 
 
 

Comments


Disclaimer:
These kits and consulting services provide educational guidance and organizational tools for O visa applicants only.

They are not legal advice and do not replace consultation with an immigration attorney.

Portico/Sandra Kluge cannot guarantee approval, and clients remain responsible for all submitted materials.

Privacy:
We respect your privacy and will never share your personal information without your consent.

Terms:
By purchasing or using our services, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

© Portico / Sandra Kluge 2025. All rights reserved.

bottom of page